Since The Brief is positioned as a cultural curator, there is value in outsourcing these questions. In conversations with others, I encountered a range of perspectives. Some believe that the more culture is shared, the more room there is for empathy, respect, and understanding to grow. Consider the recent Met Gala and its tribute to Black Dandyism and the rich Sapeur culture of the DRC, or Brazil’s Funk Carioca culture, where young men and boys bleach their hair and facial hair as a homage to life in the heart of Brazil and preserve its deep musical roots. When culture is spotlighted with care, it can invite curiosity rather than consumption. But visibility carries weight. With recognition comes judgment, criticism, and, at times, disregard. This was evident in the backlash following musician Sailorr’s public display of a traditional South-East Asian practice: dyeing teeth black. Something layered, traditional, and deeply cultural was reduced to directionless debates on racism, decorum, and selective modern beauty standards. As the audience, how do we decide to celebrate one culture and shame the other? What or who gives us the right? No one actually. And yet, here we are.
Too much of something good can be bad, they said. When cultures relinquish their rights to gatekeep, unwanted intentions may slip in. While we hope and look for the good in people and the media, the exploitative aspects can never be entirely put to bed. Granted, every coin has two sides, so does every story. The stories, otherwise known as cultures, harbour two sides, one that is celebrated and one that is preferably gatekept: merely as a means of preservation. This is not ana rgument against sharing culture, but a call for balance. Culture deserves a home, a people, and a context to return to— rather than becoming something endlessly gawked at or stripped of meaning.